The Top 5 Non-Energy Sources of Climate Change
I've never bought into that cow farts angle, though. I'm sure bison farts were almost the same. There were 60,000,000 of them before Columbus.
Labels: bison, global warming
"He who passively accepts evil is as much involved in it as he who helps to perpetrate it. He who accepts evil without protesting against it is really cooperating with it." * Martin Luther King Jr. // * "There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them." * George Orwell // Want to contact the Stubble Jumping Redneck? Shoot her an email @ oldweesie@sasktel.net
Labels: bison, global warming
7 Comments:
testing
Well maybe cows fart a lot more than bison because of what we feed them getting them ready for the slaughter house. Bison grazed on grasslands alone. But then again, maybe bison farted as much as cows and that why we had fairly temperate weather back then. After we slaughtered them all, the fossil fuel burning picked up the slack. My theory is plausible, don't cha think? (:<))
Test completed and successful. Weird thing have been happening with my connection lately. If you've been having trouble posting comments perhaps that's why. I don't know who to blame but I'll settle for Sasktel.
Weird "thingS"
It has to be bison farts. Remember the Viking agricultural settlements in the south shore of Greenland way back in the early middle ages.
Mind you, maybe it was the Chinese who have been burning coal for 3000 years. According to Wikipedia the Chinese were able to take three baths per week!! by burning coal to heat water. They must have been very clean people and not the least bit smelly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coal#Early_uses_as_fuel
Your Chinese theory is as plausible as my bison fart theory.
Post a Comment
<< Home