Curious Omission
Listen to the Iranian spokesman, Sadegh Zibakalam, beginning around 9:27 through to 10:12 or so. He lists all the countries that supported Saddam Hussein, providing money for the development of chemical weapons which he used during the Iran-Iraq war.
Conspicuous by its absence is the one funder that the leftards of the world like to keep hammering away on, to the exclusion of all others. Is it significant that Sadegh Zibakalan did not mention that country? Might the WikiLeaks revelations showing the Gulf States pleading with the USA to attack Iran have something to do with that omission? Would the tone of the dialog have been different if not for WikiLeaks revelations? Would there even be conciliatory language, had there not been the leak of the words of Saudi King Abdullah and others?
Conspicuous by its absence is the one funder that the leftards of the world like to keep hammering away on, to the exclusion of all others. Is it significant that Sadegh Zibakalan did not mention that country? Might the WikiLeaks revelations showing the Gulf States pleading with the USA to attack Iran have something to do with that omission? Would the tone of the dialog have been different if not for WikiLeaks revelations? Would there even be conciliatory language, had there not been the leak of the words of Saudi King Abdullah and others?
Labels: Iran, Middle East, nukes, Wikileaks
posted by Louise at 6:24 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home