Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Oh, I'm Soooooo Embarrasssed - Not

Down at this entry, Saskboy has told me I am embarrassing myself.

He wants me to believe that catastrophic droughts are in store for Saskatchewan.

It would be interesting to see how the U of R scientists explain past droughts.
"Bonsal and Regier report that "over the agricultural region of the Prairies, 2001 and 2002 generally ranked high in terms of spatial extent and severity of drought," and that "at some stations the 2001/2002 drought was the most severe one on record." Nevertheless, they state that "the SPI and PDSI as drought indicators revealed that the worst and most prolonged Prairie-wide droughts during the instrumental record (1915-2002) ... occurred in the early part of the 20th century (1915 through the 1930s)."
[---]
"So, we know when the most severe and widespread droughts of the historical record occurred on the Canadian Prairies (1915 through the 1930s); but as for why they occurred at that time is anybody's guess, although we definitely know they were not caused by anthropogenic CO2 emissions!"
Never mind that record rainfalls have been the norm across the Canadian prairie this year. Never mind, that none of the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming models predicted a downturn, now in it's tenth year, in the global temperatures. Never mind that alarmist scientists are now reduced to engaging in some pretty creative doublespeak:



Never let facts get in the way, Saskboy.

Labels: ,

3 Comments:

Blogger Dave in Pa. said...

Yeah, ain't that grand logic? The trend of global cooling proves global warming.

One of my favorites was from a woman BBC "journalist" talking about the decade-long cooling trend in the S. American Andes Mountains. Longer, colder winters and shorter, cooler summers, with much shorter growing seasons. Peruvian residents (almost all subsistence farmers) at higher levels of the Andes are especially starting to suffer from this.

This twit "journalist" prattled about this being an effect of accelerating global warming.

(We could talk about how the BBC pension funds are very heavily invested in "global warming" related stocks, giving them a vested interest in "global warming". Also a huge conflict of interest for a public news network, which they never mention. I wonder what other MSM entities have such investments???)

August 18, 2010 11:00 am  
Blogger Louise said...

"public news network", the scourge of our times.

August 18, 2010 11:15 am  
Blogger Louise said...

I've been slowly plowing my way through Heaven and Earth: Global Warming and the Missing Science by Ian Plimer. Absolutely fascinating chock a block full of actual facts about climate and its influences. CO2, of course, is not one of them. Volcanic activity on the bottom of the oceans, is though. And the Climate "scientists" pushing the AGW meme completely ignore that. I've got the thing all dog-eared and I think I'm going to post a few of the key quotes that I've underlined. I doubt any AGW promoting "scientist" could come up with 503 page tome with 2,311 references to published scientific and historical literature in support of the hoax.

August 18, 2010 11:33 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home