Monday, March 24, 2008

NDP Irrelevance Comes Home to Roost

This is too delicious to pass up:
"Since his election in 2003 as the New Democratic Party's sixth leader, the media-savvy Torontonian has moved it to the centre and shaved off its more controversial policies."
[SNIP]
"However, some are now wondering whether the NDP has lost its way."
And look at what our esteemed former Premier advises:
"'I think that unless the New Democrats hold out a vision of a significantly modified capitalism, then we find it difficult to differentiate ourselves from the Liberals.'"
I second that. Might as well finish off the freefall.
"He (Layton) did say the fact that the NDP finished in a virtual tie with the Green Party in three of the four by-elections means he has more work to do to persuade voters his party is a better environmental choice..."
Like Sean says. We have more than two parties and we are the better for it.

And here's another good one about Layton from a few days ago:

"NDP dances with fourth-party status"

I especially like this (emphasis mine):
"He’s made the case for himself as the only national party leader who would flee Afghanistan on the first flight, if the choice was his. He has complained loud and long that the government persists in using budget surpluses to pay off debts run up by previous governments, rather than spending it as fast as it comes in. And for this he faces the prospect of turning the NDP into a fourth-place party."
And this:
"Maybe it will awaken him to the fact Canadians have moved beyond the NDP’s traditional nostrums, and are looking for something new. Don’t bet on it though."
As if I would.

7 Comments:

Blogger Sean S. said...

I wouldn't put too much faith into an article on the NDP in the National Post. I would also wait until the next full election results before proclaiming the demotion of the NDP below the Green's, similar predictions have occurred in the past but never come to realization.

As for the Curry piece (the first link), he never gives any examples of the party moving more to the centre, which they haven't. Also, if you read the entire article he doesn't give any concrete examples of "crumbling".

Is it concerning that the NDPs numbers are not higher in pre-election polls, from my perspective - yes. But irrelevant? not on your best day Louise....the NDP still resonates very loudly with 15-18% of Canadians, and I don't know about you, but I don't think that even 5% is irrelevant.

March 24, 2008 8:25 pm  
Blogger Louise said...

Sure a brave face!!

March 24, 2008 9:36 pm  
Blogger huffb1 said...

LOL, I posted a link to that story Yesterday.

March 24, 2008 9:41 pm  
Blogger Sean S. said...

After awhile you learn to discount most columns on the NDP by pundits of any of Canada's leading newspapers....

The only "movement to the centre" that I can think of was the baffling decisions to jump on the Chalk River bandwagon and the veiled voters bandwagon...both of which resulted in a few quick emails to key people (not that the opinion of a lowly RA prez is even considered, but one can dream)...

March 24, 2008 10:26 pm  
Blogger Louise said...

Sean, what new idea has the NDP come up with in your lifetime? They haven't got new ideas. I would not be the least surprised if they go the way of many other small protest parties throughout Canadian history. Just the fact that Allan Blakney can still, in this day and age, suggest that the party might get some traction by offering "significantly modified capitalism" says it all. All they know how to do is recycle old, unworkable ideas. And you're blog is nothing but harping and complaining. It's boring. Sorry for being blunt.

March 25, 2008 5:37 am  
Blogger Louise said...

Huff, maybe that's where I saw it. I bookmarked it, anyway, thinking I might be able to use it.

March 25, 2008 5:38 am  
Blogger Louise said...

Sheesh. Too early in the morning.

Blakney = Blakeney
you're = your

March 25, 2008 6:42 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home